I gave an interview to Mr P.S. Suryanarayana of The Hindu before my visit to India for the inaugural ministerial consultation between me and Shri Pranab Mukherjee.
George Yeo
Date:21/04/2008 URL: http://www.thehindu.com/2008/04/21/stories/2008042155451100.htm
Yeo: There are no irritants in India-Singapore relations
P. S. Suryanarayana
“… you need to have some progress on the border problem [between India and China]. I don’t see that not happening.”
In a reflective interview to P.S. Suryanarayana in Singapore, its Foreign Minister George Yeo narrates how the dynamics of India-China engagement are seen and felt in the City-State.
You will be starting a new mechanism, Joint Ministerial Committee (JMC), which will meet in New Delhi this week. India and Singapore have a robust relationship. Will it transcend the traditional notions of strategic partnership?
Whatever you call it, it is a strategic relationship, which both sides see as not only mutually beneficial but also necessary. This is the inaugural [JMC] meeting. And, then [will follow] a strategic dialogue [whose] inaugural meeting will be held in Singapore.
Are you looking at any new projects at this JMC meeting?
It is good always to have a discussion on what is going on in the world and [how] we should respond to these changes. I have always found it useful to talk to [External Affairs Minister] Pranab Mukherjee: very experienced, very wise.
One of the likely new ventures is the special economic zone (SEZ). Has Singapore been given the green light from the Indian side to go ahead?
We are certainly interested.
Singapore has had a particularly important role in China. Will it be qualitatively different in India?
We have industrial estates in China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia. Each has got to take into account local conditions.
SEZ is a politically sensitive issue in India. Have you already zeroed in on any particular area?
Ascendas has been in discussions with different groups in different parts of the country. [The project] must make commercial sense, and it must respect local sensitivities. In India, you operate within a different framework [compared to China].We are very used to operating in different environments (Laughs genially). And, the key here is: we understand that this issue is particularly sensitive in India, and we will accommodate it. We will work with that sensitivity in mind.
What is the secret of the recent deletion of some items of liberalised trade-in-goods from the (India-Singapore) Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement?
This is the usual horse-trading that goes on when free trade agreements are reviewed. There’re always trade-offs.
This is not an issue?
Not at all. (Laughs heartily) Best as I know, as of now, there’s no irritant in our bilateral relationship.
Any particular focus, to start with, in the Strategic Dialogue?
It’s between Prof. Tommy Koh and Dr. S.K. Lambah (leaders of the Singapore and Indian delegations to this Dialogue). You have on the Asian landscape something truly historic, which is the simultaneous re-emergence of two ancient powers.
The United States today is a wounded superpower and also somewhat of a sliding economy. If that can be taken as a framework, are India and China in a position to restructure the East Asian security architecture?
No, not for a long time to come. China and India are growing, while the U.S. is dominant and [will] remain dominant for a long time.
I see so many Indians now in very high positions in the U.S. in all fields. It’s a great asset to India, which gives the U.S.-India relationship a quality which China can only wish it has. [But] China has been recognised by the Pentagon as the only country on the horizon which can compete with the U.S. strategically.
There is [also] an interesting phenomenon that the world meets in the U.S. Oh! Should I say: the American dream became the Asian dream. [Moreover] China and India are engaged in a new encounter: unparalleled, without precedent. It is a huge engagement which will be interesting and surprising (Emphasises in a positive tone). And, it has only just started.
We sense it in Singapore (Says with a touch of emotion). We sense this new age, because we are like an approximate precursor of what may be happening on a much larger scale. We have two-or-three thousand Indian companies; 3,000 Chinese companies, huge migrations [of people] from India and China. They meet in our classrooms, the restaurants; and, sometimes I wonder: “God, What’s going on!” You know: in our condominiums, how they encounter each other; some lead separate lives, some inter-marry. It is something which you will see replicated a thousand times across Asia, maybe in Bombay, in Shanghai, Hong Kong. It’s a huge phenomenon which is just beginning to appear before us.
You were saying that the American dream has in a sense become the Asian dream as well. Given the American dream in Asia since the end of the Second World War, will the U.S. feel threatened by the simultaneous rise of China and India now?
The U.S. of course [would] like to have an ally in India. But India is too big to be anybody’s pawn. [And] India recognises that China is a permanent neighbour.
[And, while] it has become a multi-polar world, with the U.S. still the strongest pole, there are two emerging poles which are becoming more and more influential: China and India. Everybody is playing the field, in an electromagnetic sense.
As the Chair of the Association of South East Asian Nations Regional Forum (ARF) and also the East Asia Summit (EAS), both of which include India and China, what does Singapore make of their engagement?
Take Tibet. China has been emphatic in praising India for doing the right thing, and India has been very careful in doing the right things. So, when the [Olympic] Torch went through Delhi, the Indian Army was on both sides to ensure that nothing happened to the flame. (Laughs heartily) I fully expected that. It is too important a relationship to be trifled with by either side.
China has settled its land borders with everybody else, including Russia and even Vietnam. So, you need to have some progress on the border problem [between India and China]. I don’t see that not happening. There is no history of antagonism between the two sides, except for the brief war (in 1962) which remains a scar in the Indian psyche [but] ... not in the consciousness of most Chinese. So, whenever I have a chance, I tell the Chinese: “Hey! Look. You must factor this in.”
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently suggested that the six-party talks on the North Korean nuclear issue, which bring Washington as a participant, can be institutionalised. What is the game-plan?
If the six-party talks, after making some progress, can also provide a readymade platform for other areas of cooperation, that should only be encouraged. With the U.S. having been a part of the past [in East Asia], it must also be a part of the future.[As for the] East Asia Summit, the U.S. has not expressed interest [in joining]. From Singapore’s perspective, the EAS is a very important grouping which brings China and India together.
© Copyright 2000 - 2008 The Hindu
(Courtesy - The Hindu)
Recent Comments